A Haiku For Your Thesis
It can’t be perfect.
It can be good, could be great,
And you can be too.
Tag: thesis
Perfectly Impossible
I got a note from an anonymous seminar participant:
I have written the perfect thesis. Should I worry about the viva?
If the first statement was true, I could see no reason why they should. If their thesis was perfect, really, why would they need to worry? If I had a perfect thesis, there wouldn’t be much point!
Small problem: there is no perfect thesis. Imperfection is inevitable. The perfect thesis is an impossibility.
But an imperfect thesis doesn’t automatically mean that someone should worry. They might anyway, because they have doubts, or questions, or 101 concerns. And there could be a problem in any imperfect thesis that leads to tough questions or tricky corrections: both are part of the process, neither “should” be worried about.
An imperfect thesis doesn’t mean you failed. It means that you didn’t achieve the impossible.
You have a thesis. You have you. You have everything you need to beat back your worries and succeed in the viva.
Engaging With Criticism
If your examiner tells you they don’t like something in your thesis you have options:
- You could say sorry, and do whatever they say as a result.
- You could stare them down, insist that you’re right, and see what happens.
- You could argue with them and try to show you’re right.
- You could discuss things, listen to what they have to say and put your best case forwards.
- You could ask them, “Why do you think that?” and listen before responding.
And you could do a lot more. I’m not suggesting you could have 100% control over how you feel or what you would automatically say as a result of criticism. It can cut deep, you might not know what to do. But there are different options open to you.
How you engage with your examiners can lead to very different ways of being in the viva.
Significant Original Contribution
I’ve heard these three words used so many times to describe what a PhD needs to produce. I’ve said them myself thousands of times in workshops! But what do we mean when we say these words? What are we getting at? Checking the thesaurus gives some helpful ideas…
Significant: compelling, important, momentous, powerful, serious, rich…
Original: authentic, initial, first, beginning, pioneer, primary…
Contribution: addition, improvement, increase, augmentation, present, gifting…
Significant original contribution is nice shorthand to capture the result of a PhD’s journey. Go deeper into the words to remind yourself just how awesome your research is.
Tearing Off The Paper
About six weeks ago I watched as a dozen children almost went to war in my living room. The reason?
Pass The Parcel.
It was my daughter’s fifth birthday party, and she’d insisted on playing a lot of games, including Pass The Parcel. We decided it would be like Pass The Parcel from our childhoods, with a single prize in the centre, and no little prize with every layer.
Well.
The kids were in uproar. We told them there was just one in the centre, but they were confused. Wh- Why?! Where were the little prizes? Then I want to win the one in the centre! They were desperate to hold on to the parcel in case this layer was the layer. They stopped having fun. We thought it would be alright, they would see the fun in taking part, taking a layer off getting closer to the prize, but they didn’t. Wanting the prize was too much for them. In the end, we fudged the final round so a particularly desperate child won.
(I feared tears and physical violence if they didn’t)
I was thinking about this game of Pass The Parcel the other day and was reminded of my PhD, and research more generally.
Sometimes, you only get to tear the paper off; sometimes, you don’t get to the big answer, the thing you were looking for. You get closer, but not all the way to the prize.
And that’s fine, you learn, you grow and you move everyone in your field forward.
It can be hard though, doing a PhD, writing a thesis, preparing for the viva, to see it that way. It might be true, but will your examiners see it that way? Or will they focus solely on why you didn’t get to the end goal? Examiners appreciate that not every research journey ends at the point one might want. They’ll have the experience to recognise what you’ve done if you don’t reach the point you wanted.
Your job, if this is your situation, is to be able to talk about how far you went. How close you came. What the different layers you tore off were. How you might have done it differently. And what other steps someone might need to take to reach the prize.
Decode Your Thesis
My thesis was full of codewords: technical terms and jargon that would have been tough for the uninitiated to break.
Genus 2 manifold. Unoriented link. Plait presentation.
How coded is your thesis? Jargon can save on words and be a shorthand for precision. It can also keep people out – maybe even you!
Check your codewords during your viva preparation. Make a short glossary to be sure of your definitions. Decode tricky terms in the margins. Stick in Post-it Notes with concise explanations.
Unpicking the meaning of words can help you think about how to explain them even better.
Unwritten
What did you not put in your thesis?
As my submission got closer there were several ideas I worked on which didn’t make it into my thesis. One little project was just too big in the end, and I couldn’t find a way to explain it concisely. One I chose not to pursue because it was just a restatement of ideas in a different way. And one section was a nice idea that just wouldn’t add much to the overall value of my thesis.
Reflecting with years of hindsight: the reasons why I didn’t include something stand in stark contrast with the things that I did include in my thesis. My thesis made contributions to my field. I judged, with support from my supervisor, that the things I left out did not make a meaningful contribution compared to the things I kept in.
If you’re finishing your PhD, what are you leaving unwritten? Why is it staying out? How does it compare with the work that makes up your thesis?
Looping Thesis Reflections
I like Pat Thomson‘s recent post about looping. In it she describes a useful writing method to quickly expand on a topic, then reflect to distil down, before expanding again. It seems like a nicely structured approach to get yourself started on a topic, or begin exploring new ideas.
It strikes me that it would also be really neat for reflecting on your research as the viva gets closer:
- Pick an aspect of your work and just write freely about it for fifteen or twenty minutes.
- Then take some time to reflect: What have you been writing about? What are you getting at?
- Summarise your reflections in one sentence.
- Now use this sentence as a starting point for a new period of writing.
- Reflect and repeat until you feel satisfied.
I like Pat’s idea of reading through and thinking about everything that’s been written at the end too. An hour or so of writing and reflecting in this way could do a lot to get you exploring your thesis in a new way at the end of your PhD. A neat method for shaking off the cobwebs and seeing what else is in your work.
Pat’s a very generous academic, and shares brilliant ideas every week on her blog. I’d recommend you take a look at her past posts because I’m sure you’ll find something useful!
Use Your Acknowledgements Page
The acknowledgements page of a thesis is a lovely opportunity to be thankful.
Thank your supervisors for all they’ve done.
Thank your family and friends by name.
Thank your funders if you have them.
Thank anyone who has really helped.
Looking back at mine, and at others I’ve seen, the acknowledgements page is a time capsule. A little slice of a time when you were someone else. I’ve not stayed in touch with many of the friends who helped me through my PhD. That page reminds me of who I have to be thankful to, and who made a difference.
Say thank you.
On The Surface
Imagine your thesis is an iceberg.
You can see it floating in a sea of knowledge. Big and beautiful, possibly dangerous! A hazard for other ideas, crashing and crushing, but approached carefully you can study it. Someone can think about how it relates to other icebergs/theses, what it means. They can dream up questions about it. Depending on who that someone is, depending on their experience – their own icebergs – those questions could be tricky…
But there’s more than what’s on the surface.
If an examiner or anyone else reads your thesis they see the surface iceberg. Your research and experience are underwater: a massive bulk of knowledge, skill, time, patience, talent, persistence. Quietly hidden, but there all the same.
Your examiners can ask about what they see on the surface, make guesses perhaps at what else is in the watery shadows.
You appreciate it all though; the surface iceberg-thesis and the experience-knowledge-skill-time-patience-talent-persistence-ice-mountain of research beneath the surface. It’s all there for you when you need it, hiding in the depths.
(with thanks to Sylvia Duckworth and Hugh Kearns for inspiration!)