It’s almost four weeks since I last updated with news of the research. This is largely because I’ve been quietly finding half an hour here and there to standardise the dataset and start to look at some basic patterns in the information. It’s going to take time, and I’m staying focussed at the moment on making sure that I have something valuable to share with people. In early July I’m delivering two sessions where I’m being asked to share my findings, so that will be the first public venue for telling people, which is very exciting.
I’d not thought about it until just as I was writing this post, but the podcast itself would be a good means for sharing what I’ve learned – perhaps a couple of shorter episodes that are targeted to specific parts of the survey? What do you think?
This is just a short post really because I wanted to ask for YOUR thoughts. I asked seven questions (eight, if you count the optional email/Twitter request) in the survey. Given the following seven questions, to which I got 302 responses, what sort of questions might I ask of the data? And what sort of things would be good to look for?
- When was your viva?
- Which university did you do your research at?
- What was your research field?
- How long was your viva?
- What kind of pass did you get? (No corrections; Minor corrections; Major corrections)
- Were you told that you had passed at the start or the end of the viva? (Start; End)
- What three words come to mind when you think of your viva?
Over to you: what might I look for?
Please let me know what you think, either by leaving a comment here, tweeting at me, or even drop me an email!
Thanks for reading,
Nathan (@DrRyder and @VivaSurvivors)